Abstract

While there are many aspect-oriented modeling (AOM) approaches, from requirements to low-level design, it is still difficult to compare them and know under which conditions different approaches are most applicable. This comparison, however, is crucially important to unify existing AOM and more traditional object-oriented modeling (OOM) approaches and to generalize individual approaches into a comprehensive end-to-end method. Such a method does not yet exist. This paper reports on work done at the inaugural Comparing Modeling Approaches (CMA) workshop towards the goal of identifying potential comprehensive methodologies: (i) a common, focused case study for six modeling approaches, (ii) a set of criteria applied to each of the six approaches,
and (iii) the assessment results.

-- GunterMussbacher - 01 Jun 2012

Discussion

  • Please contact gunterm@eecs.uottawa.ca for a copy of this paper.
  • Please feel free to discuss this article directly on this page. Constructive comments are welcomed! Please sign your TWiki name.

FormForVirtualLibrary edit

Title Comparing Six Modeling Approaches
Authors G. Mussbacher, W. Al Abed, O. Alam, O., S. Ali, A. Beugnard, V. Bonnet, R. Bræk, A. Capozucca, B.H.C. Cheng, U. Fatima, R. France, G. Georg, N. Guelfi, P. Istoan, J.-M. Jézéquel, J. Kienzle, J. Klein, J.-B. Lézoray, S. Malakuti, A. Moreira, A. Phung-Khac, and L. Troup
Type Conference
Conference/Journal Title 1st Comparing Modeling Approaches Workshop (CMA 2011)
Volume/Number LNCS 7167
Editors
Publisher Springer
Month -
Year 2012
Pages 217-243
DOI 10.1007/978-3-642-29645-1_22
Keywords
Topic revision: r2 - 10 Dec 2012, GunterMussbacher
This site is powered by FoswikiCopyright © by the contributing authors. All material on this collaboration platform is the property of the contributing authors.
Ideas, requests, problems regarding Foswiki? Send feedback