Abstract
Goal modeling languages are now an integral part of requirements engineering. They allow for the systematic capture of rationales for stakeholder needs and enable the reasoning about potential system solutions. The goal-oriented Requirement Language (GRL) is both a typical goal modeling language and an international standard, yet it suffers from many shortcomings, akin to deadly sins, that relate to its concrete syntax, semantics, approach to modularity, analysis, and extensibility. Based on 10 years of experience using GRL, we discuss several shortcomings and point to relevant future work areas. -- Daniel Amyot - 23 Jul 2011Discussion
- Available online at http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-766/paper01.pdf
- Please feel free to discuss this article directly on this page. Constructive comments are welcomed! Please sign your TWiki name.
Form For Virtual Library edit
| Title | Eight Deadly Sins of GRL |
| Authors | G. Mussbacher, D. Amyot, and P. Heymans |
| Type | Conference |
| Conference/Journal Title | 5th International i* Workshop |
| Volume/Number | Vol-766 |
| Editors | J. Castro, X. Franch, J. Mylopoulos, E. Yu |
| Publisher | CEUR-WS |
| Month | August |
| Year | 2011 |
| Pages | 2-7 |
| DOI | |
| Keywords | Goal Modeling, GRL, Syntax, Semantics, Modularity, Analysis |
Topic revision: r3 - 15 Feb 2012 - 21:45:12 - Daniel Amyot
 |
|
Copyright © by the contributing authors. All material on this collaboration platform is the property of the contributing authors. Ideas, requests, problems regarding Foswiki? Send feedback